Cities by quality of life... somehow....

Exciting adventures in meat space.
User avatar
eVoL
 
Posts: 32149
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Jettisoned through that hairy wormhole.

Cities by quality of life... somehow....

Postby eVoL » Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:17 pm

http://www.theguardian.com/business/201 ... ?CMP=fb_gu

Yeah, I find it hard to believe there are only 54 better cities to live in than Glasgow ¬_¬
Wouldst thou like to live deliciously?

User avatar
Raid
Duke of Preys-World
 
Posts: 25130
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 5:48 pm
Location: Ding!

Re: Cities by quality of life... somehow....

Postby Raid » Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:29 pm

I can't actually find how a city qualifies to be on that list. Baghdad is is in 230th place and last, but the wikipedia page for the survey suggests there are 6921 entries. So are Newcastle, Manchester, Leeds and so on worse to live in than Baghdad, or does it only include cities above a certain population?

User avatar
Mantis
Admin
 
Posts: 26990
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: Nobody's Here

Re: Cities by quality of life... somehow....

Postby Mantis » Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:45 pm

It can't be based off population or places like Manchester would definitely have made the list. Belfast is on there for UK and it has a tiny population.

Unless Baghdad genuinely is better to live in.

User avatar
Raid
Duke of Preys-World
 
Posts: 25130
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 5:48 pm
Location: Ding!

Re: Cities by quality of life... somehow....

Postby Raid » Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:50 pm

Hence my confusion.


Return to General & Real World

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests