Page 3 of 3

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 5:20 pm
by Subway Diet
katarn wrote:
Subway Diet wrote: Just that the onset of motion sickness and a panic attack that distracted me. :(

Is it the depth of detail that caused the motion sickness? Or just being in the cinema itself?

I've read of there being an increase in cases of vertigo with modern cinema goers, due to digital films cramming in endless detail at varying distances (that and 3D obviously). For some people, the eye just can't find a focal point or something.
Won't deny that I'm prone to that kind of thing. Like, games with small FOV or floaty camera movement do my head in.

But yeah, it was a smaller screen, though I ended up sitting a little too close and off to the side. Not sure what exactly did it, I'd wager it was seeing the flying shots at a weird, too-close angle that set things off. Could feel my equilibrium going every time there was a long pan over the cityscape.
This being a Blade Runner film, there was quite a few of those!

Funny. I survived the boats and air combat of Dunkirk just fine. 8-[

(For the record, I started feeling massively shitty. Don't want anyone thinking that I ran off just because of a mild little headache.)

Edit: Oh, what? Top of the page? :?

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:52 pm
by Mantis
£17.50 for a 3D IMAX ticket at our local cinema now! I'm sure that's about £4 more expensive than when I went to see Rogue One at Christmas.

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:45 pm
by Quietman
Booked tickets for myself and four friends for the midnight showing at our local IMAX. Can't wait :D

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:47 am
by Achtung Englander
listening to the OST on Spotify the music is just a too much like the OST of Arrival. Even though they are differing composers, the 80s electronic vibe of Vangelis is replaced by a modern soundtrack, which does sound magical and has hints of Vangelis, but imo not one I would revisit often as I would the score of Blade Runner.

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:52 pm
by Mantis
That was a very different movie to the original. Overall I'd say it stands alone fairly well and has a pretty different vibe. The claustrophobic gritty noir isn't really there in the same way, though it is visually absolutely stunning and really has a lot of atmosphere. Overall though the version of the future presented here did feel more Ghost in the Shell than Blade Runner.

I think it was a much more straight forward movie too, less of a subtext running through like the original had, which is kind of to be expected when you consider how this sequel was sort of tacked on so many years later. Not that the plot and writing isn't all well handled, I should point out.

Overall agree with Achtung's review. Jared Leto and his assistant didn't really feel very well fleshed out at all. But the plot is still very strong, if totally unambiguous. And the Gaff cameo was very much appreciated.

I also quite liked the soundtrack. Pretty much the only reason I went to see it in 3D IMAX was to hear it over their sound system. It's no Vangelis but it was still very good, the booming synth bass lent itself well to the visuals. It had a much more modern edge to it though, certainly no jazz like in the original.

So yes, definitely a great movie, really quite a fantastic experience. It's biggest failing I think is that it doesn't really have the same feeling the original had, but that doesn't necessarily impact on the quality of the movie on its own merit.

Very glad I went to see it on the big screen. That was my first cinema trip this year.

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:00 pm
by Mantis
It's been nearly a week and I keep thinking about this movie. I think I may have to go see it again.

Has everyone else been yet? Curious that a fair few were talking of it but nobody really came back to give any thoughts on it.

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:03 pm
by Sly Boots
I'd definitely like to see it, it's just rare that I get to go to the cinema these days.

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:13 pm
by Mantis
I would say that it's definitely one of those movies that is heavily enhanced by seeing it on the large screen, definitely worth trying to squeeze a viewing in.

I read a review somewhere that said it is essentially just a $200m art house movie, which I think sums it up pretty nicely. It burns so slowly for nearly three hours, you just sort of get lost in the beautiful cinematography and atmosphere. There are protracted scenes with no dialogue at all but there's so much else going on to engross you that you'd hardly clock it.

I really like this movie. -_-

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:57 am
by Animalmother
Went to see it last week, wasn't that enthused by it to be honest. Not a bad film just over long and some scenes just dragged.

It would probably improve with a re-watch some time in the future.

Not really a spoiler but..
Spoiler: show
Anyone else notice the Soloco style spaceship from Aliens? Meant to be a shared universe isn't it?

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:54 am
by Achtung Englander
Christ I fucking hope not

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:29 pm
by DjchunKfunK
Watched this last night and I really enjoyed it. Visually it is stunning and together with the soundtrack creates a great atmosphere. I think the only real weak link was the story which was a bit formulaic.

I don't think it matters that it creates a different feel to the original, as they talk about, the blackout has changed the world so I think it is fair for the world to have changed inbetween the two films and become less gritty noir. I think the world is in a more upbeat state than in the previous film what with the colonies and how that creates a feeling of progress and a future for mankind so I think the change fits.

Re: Blade Runner 2049

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:57 pm
by Jez
Haven't seen it myself mainly with being away from home but also because it's easily been 20 years since seeing the original and I'd like to watch that first.