http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_u ... 715418.stm
We amusingly went into this thinking we had a chance of winning because New Zealand were fielding a "weak team" of there 2nd group basically. Funnily enough we got our arses kicked. Does this mean we're weaker than a 2nd team? In short yes. In long YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSS!!
Now don't get me wrong; we started out the usual way we do. Looking pretty damn strong and like we could actually win this! Then it all went downhill (as usual) from there. We did have some good play in more quick succession rugby and not doing that usual thing where if we get to the line we grind into a mauling hault. Yet we still lacked the finesse to really actually do anything. And do you want to know why?
EDINBURGH!!!

Hadden has got it into his thick mind that when choosing a Scotland team he should field everybody from Edinburgh, ignoring Glasgow players (who are currently btw 3rd in the league compared to 5th from last Edinburgh). He totally ignores any talent from Glasgow, constantly going for the same "tried and tested" players, who are frankly in my eyes certainly tested so much we now definitely know that they're shite and shouldn't be fielded.
It's really bloody annoying, and he'll just keep continuing to do it.

So we lost again, which isn't a great surprise. And now we need to take on Australia and South Africa i think. If we don't at least secure some points or even a win, we could be looking at the team being scrubbed out of the IRB World Cup and being placed into the 2nd ranking IRB World Cup, which could cost the SRU a bloody fortune (but hell, we might win something! If we beat Pacific Islands...).
Sigh.